Rudy Giuliani Disbarred in New York for Spreading Falsehoods About 2020 Election

Rudy Giuliani Disbarred in New York for Spreading Falsehoods About 2020 Election

Rudy Giuliani, once a prominent figure in American politics and law, has been disbarred from practicing law in New York following his role in spreading falsehoods about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election. The New York appeals court’s decision is immediate and comprehensive, stripping Giuliani of his ability to practice law and hold himself out as an attorney.

 

Giuliani, who served as former President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, faced disciplinary charges for making false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers, and the public. These actions were part of his efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 election, which he claimed was marred by widespread fraud. However, these allegations were unfounded and repeatedly rejected by various courts.

 

The court’s ruling was based on findings that Giuliani’s conduct was deliberate and part of a pattern intended to deceive. His actions were seen as a grave misuse of his position, which not only violated legal ethics but also contributed to national discord following the election. The court emphasized that Giuliani’s false statements attacked and undermined the integrity of the electoral process.

 

“The seriousness of respondent’s misconduct cannot be overstated,” the court stated. “Respondent flagrantly misused his prominent position as the personal attorney for former President Trump and his campaign, through which respondent repeatedly and intentionally made false statements, some of which were perjurious, to the federal court, state lawmakers, the public, the AGC, and this court concerning the 2020 Presidential election.”

 

Ted Goodman, a spokesman for Giuliani, criticized the decision, calling it “politically and ideologically corrupted” and announced plans to appeal. Goodman argued that the decision lacked integrity and expressed hope that the appellate process would rectify the situation.

 

Giuliani’s disbarment is the latest in a series of legal and financial troubles. He had previously been suspended from practicing law in New York in June 2021 due to “uncontroverted evidence” of false statements. Giuliani faced 20 disciplinary charges, with a court-appointed referee finding that 16 of these charges were proven.

 

Despite Giuliani’s claims that he believed the allegations of election fraud were true, the court found his actions to be a calculated effort to deceive. Among his false claims were accusations that people were brought from New Jersey to vote illegally in Philadelphia, ballots were delivered in unconventional containers in Michigan, and thousands of votes were cast by deceased individuals in Georgia.

 

The disbarment decision marks a significant fall from grace for Giuliani, who once served as the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan and was a celebrated mayor of New York City. His role in promoting false narratives about the election has led to severe legal consequences, including defamation liabilities and ongoing criminal investigations in multiple states.

 

Last year, a federal judge found Giuliani liable for defaming two former election workers in Georgia, resulting in a $148 million judgment against him. Additionally, he faces state charges in Georgia and Arizona related to alleged plots to overturn election results. Giuliani has pleaded not guilty in both cases.

 

The implications of Giuliani’s disbarment are profound, reflecting the judiciary’s stance on maintaining the integrity of the legal profession and the electoral process. As the legal proceedings continue, the decision serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of undermining democratic institutions.

 

Stay tuned for further updates as we continue to cover the developments in Giuliani’s legal battles and the broader impact on election integrity and legal ethics.

 

This article provides a comprehensive overview of Rudy Giuliani’s disbarment, detailing the court’s findings, Giuliani’s response, and the broader implications for legal ethics and democracy.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.